>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thu Jan 24 13:59:59 2002
Received: from sonic.nmgi.com (HELO DEVO) (64.217.128.161)
  by 0 with SMTP; 24 Jan 2002 19:59:58 -0000
Message-ID: <00af01c1a511$a7a574b0$960111ac@DEVO>
Reply-To: "Dallas Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Dallas Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <143e01c1a4cc$0d9a8a80$a064020a@stare6nhm1hq2c> 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 60_whitelist in 2.1 + spamd
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:59:38 -0600
Organization: NMGI
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW version=2.0

there are several domain in 60_whitelist by default in 2.1.  why would it
not be checked by spamd?

[root@localhost spamassassin]# echo -e "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n\nclick
here" | spamc
>From spamassassin@localhost  Thu Jan 24 13:47:11 2002
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *****SPAM*****
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.3 required=5.0
tests=FROM_MISSING,DATE_MISSING,CLICK_BELOW,FREQ_SPAM_PHRASE,SPAM_PHRASES_02
0,SPAM_PHRASES_030,MISSING_HEADERS version=2.1
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.1 (devel $Id: SpamAssassin.pm,v 1.59
2002/01/23 08:01:53 jmason Exp $)

shouldnt one of the tests be USER_IN_WHITELIST since *fatbrain.com is in the
60_whitelist file
Dallas



_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to