----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Hurst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Ged Haywood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > I'd suggest a two digit minor version number, for example 2.01.2023 > > rather than 2.1.2023, because then we don't have the stupidity of > > version 2.2.2023 being older than 2.14.4096 (like Apache does it:). > > Um, 2.2.* is older than 2.14.* > > It's MAJOR.MINOR.<something>, not a decimal number. 2 is less than 14, > hence it's older.
No, this is Perl. Version numbers are floating point numbers. (yes I know it's a crap situation, but that's just how it works). Note: letters will break this too. Matt. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
