In article <20180505211124.gb18...@britannica.bec.de>, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote: >On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 02:24:32AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> In article <20180504224415.ga11...@britannica.bec.de>, >> Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote: >> >On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:56:59PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> >> Module Name: src >> >> Committed By: christos >> >> Date: Fri May 4 19:56:59 UTC 2018 >> >> >> >> Modified Files: >> >> src/sys/kern: uipc_sem.c >> >> >> >> Log Message: >> >> bump the pathname size to NAME_MAX as POSIX wants. >> > >> >Placing NAME_MAX on the stack is not really desirable, is it? >> >I don't think POSIX really requires them to be allowed either, but the >> >spec is a bit unclear... >> >> It's only 512 and the spec says ENAMETOOLONG if >= NAME_MAX or PATH_MAX... > >Sure, but it is calling other functions, so it can sum up. The >conditions for POSIX errors are sufficient conditions, they are not >exhaustive.
Ok, I made it allocate.
