On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 02:24:32AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: > In article <20180504224415.ga11...@britannica.bec.de>, > Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote: > >On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:56:59PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > >> Module Name: src > >> Committed By: christos > >> Date: Fri May 4 19:56:59 UTC 2018 > >> > >> Modified Files: > >> src/sys/kern: uipc_sem.c > >> > >> Log Message: > >> bump the pathname size to NAME_MAX as POSIX wants. > > > >Placing NAME_MAX on the stack is not really desirable, is it? > >I don't think POSIX really requires them to be allowed either, but the > >spec is a bit unclear... > > It's only 512 and the spec says ENAMETOOLONG if >= NAME_MAX or PATH_MAX...
Sure, but it is calling other functions, so it can sum up. The conditions for POSIX errors are sufficient conditions, they are not exhaustive. Joerg
