In article <20180504224415.ga11...@britannica.bec.de>, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> wrote: >On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:56:59PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: >> Module Name: src >> Committed By: christos >> Date: Fri May 4 19:56:59 UTC 2018 >> >> Modified Files: >> src/sys/kern: uipc_sem.c >> >> Log Message: >> bump the pathname size to NAME_MAX as POSIX wants. > >Placing NAME_MAX on the stack is not really desirable, is it? >I don't think POSIX really requires them to be allowed either, but the >spec is a bit unclear...
It's only 512 and the spec says ENAMETOOLONG if >= NAME_MAX or PATH_MAX... christos
