On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:36:57AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > Probably cleaner to check for it there?
Maybe, but I wasn't sure about the other callers. There is similar code in itimerfix() and changing it there symetrically made a lot of things fail imediately, so I went for the simple fix. > Anyway, the question is really if > we should bother to sleep at all for 0, 0 or shortcut the return. I think > we should shortcut the return. Shortcut is what I did, or do you mean something else? Martin
