In article <20130401123134.dbf3b17...@cvs.netbsd.org>, Martin Husemann <source-changes-d@NetBSD.org> wrote: >- KASSERT(*timo > 0);
This should really not be failing since itimespecfix uses tick to correct the minimal timeout. christos
In article <20130401123134.dbf3b17...@cvs.netbsd.org>, Martin Husemann <source-changes-d@NetBSD.org> wrote: >- KASSERT(*timo > 0);
This should really not be failing since itimespecfix uses tick to correct the minimal timeout. christos