On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 02:28:02PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: > In article <20130401123134.dbf3b17...@cvs.netbsd.org>, > Martin Husemann <source-changes-d@NetBSD.org> wrote: > >- KASSERT(*timo > 0); > > This should really not be failing since itimespecfix uses tick to correct > the minimal timeout.
It does not for ts_sec == 0 and ts_nsec == 0. Martin
