> > > Because of the consensus that /tests should mimic /src. The same note > > > applies to more or less all syscalls etc. Generally, the current > > > tests/kernel, tests/syscall, tests/utils et. cetera. will lead to a unholy > > > maintainability mess in the long-term. > > > > Yes, but then it should go to src/tests/sys/kern, or better into a > > subdirectory there. However, src/tests/sys seems to be something quite > > different. > > No. The tests/sys subdirectory is yet again another anomaly and should be > removed.
i don't see why tests/sys doesn't follow the consensus. there's a src/sys afterall. (i don't get why 'rc' subdir is in there, though.) .mrg.
