On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 09:10:11AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:21:47AM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:31:25PM +0000, Martin Husemann wrote: > > > src/tests/kernel/posix_spawn: Makefile Makefile.inc h_fileactions.c > > > h_nonexec.sh h_spawn.c h_spawnattr.c t_fileactions.c t_spawn.c > > > t_spawnattr.c > > > > The tests should've gone to tests/lib/libc/gen... > > Why do you think so? They only test libc functionality in a very small > part.
Because of the consensus that /tests should mimic /src. The same note applies to more or less all syscalls etc. Generally, the current tests/kernel, tests/syscall, tests/utils et. cetera. will lead to a unholy maintainability mess in the long-term. - Jukka.
