In a message dated 18/08/2005 17:20:41 GMT Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
your compariso is inept and not germane.
we are talking about particles going through lung tissue or not... but
you have all clearly evaded this issue to concentrate on dogs and cars
and transplants. gracefully concede i was right and you were wrong. <<
Subj: RE: CS>Silver particles in the lungs/reply2
Date: 18/08/2005 17:20:41 GMT Daylight Time
From: [email protected] (Ernie Patai)
Reply-to: <A
HREF="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</A> To:
[email protected]
Hi,
I would like to add to this "conversation" re: the comparison of
human lungs to dog lungs; Although, I know very little about the
structure of "dogs" lungs. We should agree that a dog is a mammal and
because he is warm blooded creature would process oxygen in a
"similar" manner as humans, Regardless of whether he pants or not. We
all remember science class, back in the day asking us what
characteristics make up a mammal right? With this being said; I would
have to agree with Ode. His explanation seems to be the most open
minded. The lung of a dog may be physically different, and based on
its genetic make-up in fact may not work in a human body. Take a car
for example. (this may be a crude one in comparison) but if you were
too take a "motor" from a very small car, And transferred it into a
full sized Cadillac. One would still have a running motor but
probably wouldn't be very successful in moving the caddy only because
of the power to weight ratio. Eventually pushing the motor to move
this car would result in fatigue and it would eventually quit or
seize. Both cars have internal combustion engines and work off the
same operating principle. Even though it can be modified to fit
doesn't mean it will be successful in creating inertia. Both need air
and gasoline to produce combustion = power. However, we are speaking
of organic material here. But still keeping in mind the principle of
the lung in a land mammal.
Regards,
E
look you are spoiling my victory.
dogs are not the same as humans.and their lungs
are biologically different from humans.
i can prove this.
if you tried to transplant a dog lung to a human it would kill the
human. dog are not the same as humans. you are confused by the fact
that humans keep dogs as pets and you think
therefore dogs are the same as humans.
this fuzzy emotionalism on your part is making you look like someone
who is a creationist.
Ode wrote:
Saying that a dogs lungs are different because dogs have to
pant..while
people only 'can' pant to the same effect, therefore particulates
take an entirely different route..is like saying that people can't
walk because they don't have enough feet.
While that might be a sort of sideways 'truth' from a dogs point of
view,
it's only because dogs don't know much about walking on two
feet...and that's not because they 'can't' walk on two feet...most
of them just never looked into doing it, those that have don't do it
very well and bark out silly arguements against it. [perhaps citing
the fact that people who do that tend to fall over more than
dogs...those stupid people]
__________________________________
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver List archive:
http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from
rly-xn04.mx.aol.com (rly-xn04.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.117])
by air-xn02.mail.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id
MAILINXN24-6414304b54ab1; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:20:40 -0400
Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (ultra5.eskimo.com [204.122.16.68])
by
rly-xn04.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id
MAILRELAYINXN41-6414304b54ab1; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:20:28 -0400
Received: from ultra5.eskimo.com (IDENT:smart...@localhost
[127.0.0.1])
by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7IGJYH2013606;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:19:50 -0700
Received: (from smart...@localhost)
by ultra5.eskimo.com (8.13.4/8.12.10/Submit) id j7IGJXmw013599;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:19:33 -0700
Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:19:33 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: ultra5.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to
[email protected] using -f
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Originating-IP: [70.49.177.122]
X-Originating-Email: [[email protected]]
From: "Ernie Patai" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CS>Silver particles in the lungs/reply2
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:19:08 -0400
Message-ID: <001101c5a410$90cccca0$657ba...@ernie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2005 16:19:12.0101 (UTC)
FILETIME=[91B66950:01C5A410]
Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Resent-From: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/84445
X-Loop: [email protected]
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [email protected]
X-AOL-IP: 204.122.16.68 X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:497792120:15032385
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
>>
