"Ole Bob" wrote, > Hi Ivan, > > I wish to thank you for questioning my conductivity reading > several weeks > ago. Reason, in my advancing years I misread the meter > scale. In stead of > being .70 uS/cm it was actually 70 uS/cm (CC) Actually > conductivity is a > scalar reading, but since my cell is one cubic centimeter I > used to use > uS/cc, but actually iS/cm (cc) better explains it.
Well Bob, 70 uS/cm is quite an achievement itself. > You chart on conductivity vs ppm is most interesting and > will hold for > most protocols. The chart is simply the resistivity and its corresponding conductivity, 1,000,000 divided by the resistance = conductivity in uS, which equals the ppm as silver ions times a fudge factor. HOWEVER I made a run yeterday that measures 14.56 ppm > (specttophotometer) and has a real conductivity of 7.0 > uS/cm (cc) and no > meter errors in this. How do you explain this? Half ions, half nano-sized particles? > The wide anode sample that I sent to Natural-immunogenics > for AA and TEM > according to their measurement has 9.87 ppm; 6.58 pH; and > cond. is 12 > uS/cm. The TEM indicates mostly sub-nm with some 24 nm size. > > The biologicals very very impressive, only slighty inferior to their > product which is the best on the market. > > "Ole Bob" I am looking forward to doing a run with a small cathode....my anode already measures 12,000 sq mm (18.6 sq in). Ivan. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
