--- Ron Cuthbertson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Yes, (I presume you mean dividing 27.6V by > 0.00595A), and yes I did > >mean 0.00595A or 0.595mA. > >4K6 = 46,000 Ohms. > > Should 4K6 not equal 4,600 Ohms? > > Ron > -- > Ron Cuthbertson I was confused about this also, but I think Ivan meant the 46,000 ohms. Another part of the problem is also the fact that 0.00595 A is 5.95 ma, not the stated 0.595 ma. This is why I noted that would be a fantastic increase of conductivity if it changed in a 10 fold manner like that.
I think I now concur with the rest of the group that this dual coin submerged, higher voltage AC approach is worthless. The decreases in voltage I observed were also accompanied by a heating of the water, thus the condensation under the plastic coin holder. After the water recooled to household temperature this apparent voltage drop was not so evident. Today I started at 680 volts @ 8.5 ma, and ended 1 hr 15 min later at 540 volts @ 8.54 ma. Checking this same thing much later again showed the 680 volts, but at 8.38 ma? I also noted that exposing the water to very high voltage afterwards changed readings. That process is only a single electrode process where high voltage is placed between the bottom of the glass and the coins, so that no complete electrical circuit is across the water. This is a different process entirely unrelated to CS, and is used to procure a neon disharge for a Rife type treatment, from SrFe magnet windings under the steel plate the water glass rests on. This process also can produce prodigious ozone, with a buzzing noise made by the magnet. After 40 minutes, and reconnecting the process of AC conduction across the water: the new readings showed 740 volts across the coins, with a smaller conduction of 8.08 ma, after this glass of water from coins to bottom glass surface was exposed to an estimated 7000 volts in that process. Here are some jpegs of this Rife/Lakhovsky process Magnet windings under CS glass process http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/MED/Dsc00449.jpg Lakhovsky adaptation to Rife treatment (the magnet windings wire endings go to this neon part) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/MED/Dsc00451.jpg Close up scoping of EM emmited by patients finger; .2 volts/div, 10 us/div http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/MED/Dsc00452.jpg It surprises me that such a lower voltage ending reading on the CS process itself could be caused by a temperature increase like that, as that seems opposite to traditional thinking of temperature vs conductivity. Even though these poor CS production aspects revealed themselves, I still note a grayish tarnish made on the coins, and after longer runs some surface water deposits. But I will go by what the experts say, the LVDC approach should definitely produce a correct product, and my opinions should be considered "out to lunch" for now... But first I will next try a fullwave DC bridge before the coins on this same process to see if similar things happen, as my diodes are rated for 600 volts, so I could be safe in trying runs at 70% of that voltage. HDN __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
