Hi Ivan, I wish to thank you for questioning my conductivity reading several weeks ago. Reason, in my advancing years I misread the meter scale. In stead of being .70 uS/cm it was actually 70 uS/cm (CC) Actually conductivity is a scalar reading, but since my cell is one cubic centimeter I used to use uS/cc, but actually iS/cm (cc) better explains it.
You chart on conductivity vs ppm is most interesting and will hold for most protocols.HOWEVER I made a run yeterday that measures 14.56 ppm (specttophotometer) and has a real conductivity of 7.0 uS/cm (cc) and no meter errors in this. The wide anode sample that I sent to Natural-immunogenics for AA and TEM according to their measurement has 9.87 ppm; 6.58 pH; and cond. is 12 uS/cm. The TEM indicates mostly sub-nm with some 24 nm size. The biologicals very very impressive, only slighty inferior to their product which is the best on the market. "Ole Bob" I -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
