On 11/2/07, Thaths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/1/07, Deepa Mohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Astrology is fairly exact, but if the input data were to be flawed, > > so would the results be. A difference of a few minutes in recording > > the time of birth could change someone's horoscope, and then it would > > appear that it is not accurate." > > How is time of birth measured? When labor begins? When the head of the > baby peeps into the world? When the feet of the baby leaves the > mother's body? When the umbilical chord is cut? Isn't the interval > between all these things in the order of a few minutes? > > Thaths
Exactly my point, Thaths!....and, to nitpick..it's umbilical "cord" ..you would get an umbilical chord only if the foetus were playing the guitar ;-) (why doesn't Google invent something to turn sideways smiles and winks in the text the proper way, too?) Deepa. > -- > Bart: I want to be emancipated. > Homer: Emancipated?! Don't you like being a dude? > -- Homer J. Simpson > Sudhakar Chandra Slacker Without Borders > >
