On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 10:05 PM, Bob Frankston via Silklist < silklist@lists.digeratus.in> wrote:
> First, beware of taking social evolution theories too seriously. The > “research” is a good example of the problem. It is a vague statement that > is so soft we can find confirmation but not contradiction. > Fair. It wasn’t neuroscientists that were involved in the research but rather anthropologists and social scientists if I remember correctly. I have tried to find the article but have failed. After some hunting, here are a few that are adjacent to ideas in my initial email. Kiran https://www.sapiens.org/biology/religion-origins/ https://www.theosthinktank.co.uk/comment/2019/08/19/where-did-religion-first-come-from https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190418-how-and-why-did-religion-evolve
-- Silklist mailing list Silklist@lists.digeratus.in https://mailman.panix.com/listinfo.cgi/silklist
