This approach would work fine. I would also like something to be included out of the box in ServiceMix.
Thanks, -jeff Andrea Zoppello-2 wrote: > > Hi, > > I think servicemix team is looking the code of spagic tcp-ip component. > > By the way i forget to say that if you want you can take the spagic > tcp-ip component alone > and install in a fresh servicemix. > > What's the problem with this approach? > > Andrea > puro ha scritto: >> So, what to do about a TCP component? :) >> >> -jeff >> >> >> gnodet wrote: >> >>> On 10/9/07, Andrea Zoppello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Guillaume, >>>> >>>> If you take a look at the document "How to cook your spagic" you could >>>> find all the information, on the patches, enhnacements that we've made >>>> on servicemix. >>>> >>>> Actually spagic is based on smx 3.1.1 codebase. >>>> >>>> By the way our approach is to keep the patches that we've done in >>>> spagic >>>> until they're >>>> taken bu smx codebase. >>>> >>> Most of the bug you are talking about have been already fixed afaik >>> (SM-781, SM-924, SM-879). One is still pending in an unknown state >>> (SM-888). You have raised another one recently about the split >>> aggregator which has been included too (not released yet). But I >>> agree some have not been relesed yet :-( >>> >>> >>>> In future versions of spagic the patches that we've update to JIRA will >>>> not be there >>>> anymore, because it will be included directly in smx :-) >>>> >>> Cool, I think that's the way to go too. Hopefully we will be able to >>> have shorter release cycles now. >>> >>> >>>> By the way have you seen my post about the needing for "Merge >>>> components" in front >>>> of a Drools or Content Based router?? >>>> >>>> >>>> Andrea Zoppello >>>> >>>> Guillaume Nodet ha scritto: >>>> >>>>> Andrea, I've just downloaded the source zip of the components and it >>>>> seems that there is lots of components coming from ServiceMix: are >>>>> these differents in some sort ? Bug fixes, enhancements ? If so what >>>>> about raising JIRAs and attaching your patches ? I know you have >>>>> already done so and iirc i have applied them ... >>>>> >>>>> On 10/9/07, Andrea Zoppello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Bruce, >>>>>> >>>>>> You can take a look at: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://forge.objectweb.org/projects/spagic >>>>>> >>>>>> In the project site you could find the source code. >>>>>> >>>>>> By the way some information the spagic TCP component is based on >>>>>> >>>> apache >>>> >>>>>> mina. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrea Zoppello >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Bruce Snyder ha scritto: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/8/07, jpuro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yup, that makes sense. But after looking at spagic it seems that >>>>>>>> >>>> they >>>> >>>>>>>> already use mina in a similar fashion and handle a lot of other >>>>>>>> >>>> requirements >>>> >>>>>>>> for tcp/ip etc. Take a look at their source code and let me know >>>>>>>> >>>> what you >>>> >>>>>>>> think. Otherwise I'll just implement my own version on apache mina >>>>>>>> >>>> as I >>>> >>>>>>>> have seen camel-mina do. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please provide a URL to the source of the code you're looking at. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bruce >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Guillaume Nodet >>> ------------------------ >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Basic-TCP-component-tf4592566s12049.html#a13119876 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
