Hi,
I think servicemix team is looking the code of spagic tcp-ip component.
By the way i forget to say that if you want you can take the spagic
tcp-ip component alone
and install in a fresh servicemix.
What's the problem with this approach?
Andrea
puro ha scritto:
So, what to do about a TCP component? :)
-jeff
gnodet wrote:
On 10/9/07, Andrea Zoppello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Guillaume,
If you take a look at the document "How to cook your spagic" you could
find all the information, on the patches, enhnacements that we've made
on servicemix.
Actually spagic is based on smx 3.1.1 codebase.
By the way our approach is to keep the patches that we've done in spagic
until they're
taken bu smx codebase.
Most of the bug you are talking about have been already fixed afaik
(SM-781, SM-924, SM-879). One is still pending in an unknown state
(SM-888). You have raised another one recently about the split
aggregator which has been included too (not released yet). But I
agree some have not been relesed yet :-(
In future versions of spagic the patches that we've update to JIRA will
not be there
anymore, because it will be included directly in smx :-)
Cool, I think that's the way to go too. Hopefully we will be able to
have shorter release cycles now.
By the way have you seen my post about the needing for "Merge
components" in front
of a Drools or Content Based router??
Andrea Zoppello
Guillaume Nodet ha scritto:
Andrea, I've just downloaded the source zip of the components and it
seems that there is lots of components coming from ServiceMix: are
these differents in some sort ? Bug fixes, enhancements ? If so what
about raising JIRAs and attaching your patches ? I know you have
already done so and iirc i have applied them ...
On 10/9/07, Andrea Zoppello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bruce,
You can take a look at:
http://forge.objectweb.org/projects/spagic
In the project site you could find the source code.
By the way some information the spagic TCP component is based on
apache
mina.
Andrea Zoppello
Bruce Snyder ha scritto:
On 10/8/07, jpuro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yup, that makes sense. But after looking at spagic it seems that
they
already use mina in a similar fashion and handle a lot of other
requirements
for tcp/ip etc. Take a look at their source code and let me know
what you
think. Otherwise I'll just implement my own version on apache mina
as I
have seen camel-mina do.
Please provide a URL to the source of the code you're looking at.
Bruce
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
