So, what to do about a TCP component? :) -jeff
gnodet wrote: > > On 10/9/07, Andrea Zoppello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Guillaume, >> >> If you take a look at the document "How to cook your spagic" you could >> find all the information, on the patches, enhnacements that we've made >> on servicemix. >> >> Actually spagic is based on smx 3.1.1 codebase. >> >> By the way our approach is to keep the patches that we've done in spagic >> until they're >> taken bu smx codebase. > > Most of the bug you are talking about have been already fixed afaik > (SM-781, SM-924, SM-879). One is still pending in an unknown state > (SM-888). You have raised another one recently about the split > aggregator which has been included too (not released yet). But I > agree some have not been relesed yet :-( > >> >> In future versions of spagic the patches that we've update to JIRA will >> not be there >> anymore, because it will be included directly in smx :-) > > Cool, I think that's the way to go too. Hopefully we will be able to > have shorter release cycles now. > >> >> By the way have you seen my post about the needing for "Merge >> components" in front >> of a Drools or Content Based router?? >> >> >> Andrea Zoppello >> >> Guillaume Nodet ha scritto: >> > Andrea, I've just downloaded the source zip of the components and it >> > seems that there is lots of components coming from ServiceMix: are >> > these differents in some sort ? Bug fixes, enhancements ? If so what >> > about raising JIRAs and attaching your patches ? I know you have >> > already done so and iirc i have applied them ... >> > >> > On 10/9/07, Andrea Zoppello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Bruce, >> >> >> >> You can take a look at: >> >> >> >> http://forge.objectweb.org/projects/spagic >> >> >> >> In the project site you could find the source code. >> >> >> >> By the way some information the spagic TCP component is based on >> apache >> >> mina. >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrea Zoppello >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bruce Snyder ha scritto: >> >> >> >>> On 10/8/07, jpuro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> Yup, that makes sense. But after looking at spagic it seems that >> they >> >>>> already use mina in a similar fashion and handle a lot of other >> requirements >> >>>> for tcp/ip etc. Take a look at their source code and let me know >> what you >> >>>> think. Otherwise I'll just implement my own version on apache mina >> as I >> >>>> have seen camel-mina do. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> Please provide a URL to the source of the code you're looking at. >> >>> >> >>> Bruce >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Basic-TCP-component-tf4592566s12049.html#a13117891 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
