On Thu, 29 May 2025 10:15:20 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Updates the thread dump generated by HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean.dumpThreads and >> jcmd Thread.dump_to_file to include thread state and lock information. Also >> update the HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean.dumpThreads API description to link to a >> description of the JSON format dump as that format is intended to be >> parseable/read by tools. >> >> This PR is dependent on >> [pull/25425](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/25425). As noted in that >> PR, the changes accumulated in the loom repo, and have been split up to make >> it easier to review. >> >> The changes include some re-implementation of ThreadDumper. This is because >> it used PrintStream and didn't fail if there was an I/O error, e.g. file >> system full. Furthermore, the indentation to pretty print the json was >> fragile and hard to maintain so this is changed to use a supporting writer >> class to do this. >> >> Test coverage is significantly expanded, including updating the test library >> that is used by several tests to parse the thread dump. >> >> Testing: tier1-6 > > Alan Bateman has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes > brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Temp fixed until fixed in pull/25425 > - Sync up from loom repo, includes review comments > - Merge branch 'pull/25425' into JDK-8356870 > - Merge branch 'pull/25425' into JDK-8356870 > - Initial commit src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/vm/ThreadDumper.java line 96: > 94: * Generate a thread dump in plain text or JSON format to a byte > array, UTF-8 encoded. > 95: * This method is the implementation of the Thread.dump_to_file > diagnostic command > 96: * when a file path is not specified. It returns the thread and/or > message to send Comment nit: maybe "...returns the thread dump text and/or message..."? (also line 120) ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25429#discussion_r2116269128