On Sun, 25 May 2025 21:09:07 GMT, Markus Grönlund <mgron...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Do we want to make hard assumptions on timer_t? > > You can have a field as a pointer: timer_t* timer and test it, timer != > nullptr. Wouldn't I need to store it somewhere? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25302#discussion_r2106634421