On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 23:23:52 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This is just a preliminary review. I'd like to get some approval for the > approach I'm taking. There are over 300 tests that need to be fixed. I've > just fixed a handful in this PR to give a feel for the changes I plan on > making. If they look ok to you, then I'll update this PR with the needed > changes to the rest of the tests. > > What this PR is fixing is the issue with all of our nsk/jdi testing being > done with includevirtualthreads=y even though debuggers typically use the > default includevirtualthreads=n. As a result we have a testing gap with > includevirtualthreads=n. There are nearly 1200 nsk/jdi tests. Only about 350 > actually need includevirtualthreads=y. I plan making includevirtualthreads=n > the default for nsk/jdi tests unless the test does something to override the > default and request includevirtualthreads=y. > > includevirtualthreads=y forces the debug agent to track all virtual threads > so they are returned by vm.allThreads(). Some tests need this since they use > vm.allThreads() to find the debuggee threads. Without > includevirtualthreads=y, vm.allThreads() usually won't return any virtual > threads (although it might return some for which events have been triggered). Chris, the approach looks okay to me. I do not have a better idea on how to make it less intrusive. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24606#issuecomment-2804220293
