serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v6] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v6] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v7] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v7] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v7] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v8] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v9] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v9] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v9] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch [v9] David Holmes
  • Integrated: 8359870: JVM crashes in AccessInternal::PostRuntimeDispatch Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8360312: Serviceability Agent tests fail with JFR enabled due to unknown thread type JfrRecorderThread Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8225354: serviceability/jvmti/ModuleAwareAgents/ThreadStart failed with Didn't get ThreadStart events in VM early start phase! Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v2] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v2] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v2] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v2] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v2] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v3] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v3] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v4] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v5] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v4] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v5] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v5] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v6] Anton Artemov
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v6] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v6] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v6] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag [v6] duke
  • Integrated: 8359437: Make users and test suite not able to set LockingMode flag Anton Artemov
• RFR: 8333117: Remove support of remote and manual debuggee launchers Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8359958: Cleanup "local" debuggee references after JDK-8333117 removed support for non-local debuggees [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8359958: Cleanup "local" debuggee references after JDK-8333117 removed support for non-local debuggees [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8359958: Cleanup "local" debuggee references after JDK-8333117 removed support for non-local debuggees [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8359958: Cleanup "local" debuggee references after JDK-8333117 removed support for non-local debuggees [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8359958: Cleanup "local" debuggee references after JDK-8333117 removed support for non-local debuggees [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8359958: Cleanup "local" debuggee references after JDK-8333117 removed support for non-local debuggees [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8359958: Cleanup "local" debuggee references after JDK-8333117 removed support for non-local debuggees [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8359958: Cleanup "local" debuggee references after JDK-8333117 removed support for non-local debuggees [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8359958: Cleanup "local" debuggee references after JDK-8333117 removed support for non-local debuggees Chris Plummer
• [jdk25] RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Radim Vansa
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Ioi Lam
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Aleksey Shipilev
  • [jdk25] Integrated: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Coleen Phillimore
• RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps [v4] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Integrated: 8359920: Use names for frame types in stackmaps Coleen Phillimore
• RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object [v6] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8359809: AttributeList, RoleList and UnresolvedRoleList should never accept other types of Object Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v3] Damon Nguyen
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Henry Jen
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Johannes Döbler
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Johannes Döbler
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v2] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v3] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v4] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v4] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v4] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v4] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v4] Damon Nguyen
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v4] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v4] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v5] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v6] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v6] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v7] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v7] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v7] Damon Nguyen
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v7] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v7] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v7] Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v7] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v7] Alisen Chung
  • Re: RFR: 8359761: JDK 25 RDP1 L10n resource files update [v8] Alisen Chung

• Earlier messages
• Later messages