serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8376023: Reconcile ClassUnloader with ClassUnloadCommon SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376023: Reconcile ClassUnloader with ClassUnloadCommon [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376023: Reconcile ClassUnloader with ClassUnloadCommon [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376023: Reconcile ClassUnloader with ClassUnloadCommon [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376023: Reconcile ClassUnloader with ClassUnloadCommon [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376023: Reconcile ClassUnloader with ClassUnloadCommon [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376023: Reconcile ClassUnloader with ClassUnloadCommon Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376023: Reconcile ClassUnloader with ClassUnloadCommon SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376023: Reconcile ClassUnloader with ClassUnloadCommon Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376023: Reconcile ClassUnloader with ClassUnloadCommon SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376023: Reconcile ClassUnloader with ClassUnloadCommon Chris Plummer
  • Withdrawn: 8376023: Reconcile ClassUnloader with ClassUnloadCommon SendaoYan
• Re: RFR: 8359706: Add file descriptor count to VM.info [v9] Kieran Farrell
• RFR: 8376956: Add JVMTI phase entering/setting to hserr event log Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8376956: Add JVMTI phase entering/setting to hserr event log Lutz Schmidt
  • Re: RFR: 8376956: Add JVMTI phase entering/setting to hserr event log Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8376956: Add JVMTI phase entering/setting to hserr event log [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8376956: Add JVMTI phase entering/setting to hserr event log [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8376956: Add JVMTI phase entering/setting to hserr event log [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8376956: Add JVMTI phase entering/setting to hserr event log Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v7] Archie Cobbs
• RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine [v4] Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8376284: New test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedCore.java from JDK-8374482 fails on Linux Alpine Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Integrated: 8376405: Virtual thread crash: assert(!_current->is_suspended()) failed: must be Patricio Chilano Mateo
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v18] Jatin Bhateja
• Integrated: 8373266: Strengthen constant CardTable base accesses Aleksey Shipilev
• RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Integrated: 8376533: Remove test dependencies on ReferenceQueue$Lock in preparation for JDK-8376477 Eirik Bjørsnøs
• RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v2] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v2] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v2] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v3] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v4] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v5] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v6] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v7] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v7] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v7] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v8] Jean-Philippe Bempel
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v8] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376185: NoSuchFieldError thrown after a record with type annotation retransformed [v8] duke
• RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v7] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v7] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v8] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v8] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v8] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v8] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v8] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v8] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v9] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v9] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v9] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v9] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v9] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v10] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v11] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v12] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v12] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case [v12] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8373367: interp-only mechanism fails to work for carrier threads in a corner case Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v17] Paul Sandoz
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v16] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v15] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v5] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v6] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v6] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v7] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v7] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v7] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v8] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v8] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v8] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO [v8] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Integrated: 8376269: Mixed jstack cannot find function in vDSO Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v4] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v5] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8376264: Mixed jstack could not unwind optimized frame Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8214294: Post ResourceExhausted events generated by CompilerThread on the ServiceThread Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8214294: Post ResourceExhausted events generated by CompilerThread on the ServiceThread David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8214294: Post ResourceExhausted events generated by CompilerThread on the ServiceThread David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8214294: Post ResourceExhausted events generated by CompilerThread on the ServiceThread Leonid Mesnik
  • Withdrawn: 8214294: Post ResourceExhausted events generated by CompilerThread on the ServiceThread Leonid Mesnik
• Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands [v5] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands [v5] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357828: Add a timestamp to jcmd diagnostic commands [v5] Kevin Walls

• Earlier messages
• Later messages