On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 08:50:04 GMT, Kim Barrett <kbarr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I'd forgotten about that format option too, which is why I'm not enamored of >> it. Also, written that way the >> prefix gets included in the width when dealing with field width, which might >> not be great either. > > The problem of accounting for the prefix in the field width calculation can > be dealt with by using precision > rather than field width. Well then that leaves the fun of dealing with these format specifiers when you're trying to do your own formatting. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22916#discussion_r1905390045
