On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 14:10:27 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <cole...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> To be clear I would expect arrayKlass to define a pure virtual function for >> this, and then each subclass overrides as required. Otherwise you can't >> generally operate on an arrayKlass but must always know what subtype you are >> dealing with. > > Klass has a pure virtual function for this, so ArrayKlass is abstract. There > isn't a reason to redeclare it in ArrayKlass. > > virtual jint compute_modifier_flags() const = 0; Sorry I didn't realize that. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22618#discussion_r1881532974
