On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 03:06:15 GMT, Jiawei Tang <jwt...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I add the testcase which can reproduce the crash. I hope that I could get 
>> some advise if the codes need changing.
>
> Jiawei Tang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   remove useless codes and refactor the testcase

Thank you for the update! It looks good in general.
I've requested a couple of nits to split long lines in the test though.

test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/vthread/TestPinCaseWithCFLH/TestPinCaseWithCFLH.java
 line 34:

> 32:  * @run driver jdk.test.lib.util.JavaAgentBuilder
> 33:  *      TestPinCaseWithCFLH TestPinCaseWithCFLH.jar
> 34:  * @run main/othervm/timeout=100  
> -Djdk.virtualThreadScheduler.maxPoolSize=1 -Djdk.tracePinnedThreads=full 
> --enable-native-access=ALL-UNNAMED -javaagent:TestPinCaseWithCFLH.jar 
> TestPinCaseWithCFLH

Nit: Could you, please, rearrange to avoid long lines?

test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/vthread/TestPinCaseWithCFLH/TestPinCaseWithCFLH.java
 line 45:

> 43: 
> 44:     public static class TestClassFileTransformer implements 
> ClassFileTransformer {
> 45:         public byte[] transform(ClassLoader loader, String className, 
> Class<?> classBeingRedefined, ProtectionDomain protectionDomain, byte[] 
> classfileBuffer) throws IllegalClassFormatException {

Nit: Could you, please, rearrange this to avoid long lines?

test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/vthread/TestPinCaseWithCFLH/TestPinCaseWithCFLH.java
 line 61:

> 59:             VThreadPinner.runPinned(() -> {
> 60:                 try {
> 61:                     Thread.sleep(500); // try yield, will pin, javaagent 
> + tracePinnedThreads should not lead to crash (because of the class 
> `PinnedThreadPrinter`)

Nit: Could you, please, rearrange to avoid long lines?

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20373#pullrequestreview-2212212420
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20373#discussion_r1699830174
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20373#discussion_r1699831041
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20373#discussion_r1699831379

Reply via email to