On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 00:05:20 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Revert [JDK-8152664](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8152664) RFE >> [changes](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b853eb7f5ca24eeeda18acbb14287f706499c365) >> which was used for AOT [JEP 295](https://openjdk.org/jeps/295) >> implementation in JDK 9. The code was left in HotSpot assuming it will help >> in a future. But during work on Leyden we decided to not use it. In Leyden >> cached compiled code will be restored in CodeCache as normal nmethods: no >> need to change VM's runtime and GC code to process them. >> >> I may work on optimizing `CodeBlob` and `nmethod` fields layout to reduce >> header size in separate changes. In these changes I did simple fields >> reordering to keep small (1 byte) fields together. >> >> I do not see (and not expected) performance difference with these changes. >> >> Tested tier1-5, xcomp, stress. Running performance testing. >> >> I need help with testing on platforms which Oracle does not support. > > Vladimir Kozlov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes > brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Address comments > - Merge branch 'master' into 8329332 > - Removed not_used state of nmethod > - remove trailing whitespace > - 8329332: Remove CompiledMethod and CodeBlobLayout classes GHA `linux-x64-hs-minimal` failure is not related to changes: 2024-04-04T00:07:46.9654262Z ##[warning]Failed to download action 'https://api.github.com/repos/actions/github-script/tarball/60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea'. Error: The request was canceled due to the configured HttpClient.Timeout of 100 seconds elapsing. 2024-04-04T00:07:46.9656929Z ##[warning]Back off 22.252 seconds before retry. 2024-04-04T00:08:52.1252710Z ##[error]The SSL connection could not be established, see inner exception. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18554#issuecomment-2035859221
