On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 21:47:53 GMT, Leonid Mesnik <lmes...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The fix changes test serviceability/jdwp/AllModulesCommandTest.java to 
>> accept VM flags. 
>> 1) The 'ProcessTools.createTestJvm(JDWP_OPT, DEBUGGEE);'  is used to start 
>> debugee
>> 2) The stderr is just logging and tests doesn't check if it is empty. stderr 
>> might contain some VM output which doesn't mean failure
>> 3) Some refactoring is done. Method ' public void onStringRead(StreamHandler 
>> handler, String line) {' doesn't need to check which handler is used and 
>> corresponding code and methods are deleted. The field 'inputHandler' and 
>> 'errorHandler' were moved into method.
>> 
>> Tested with tier1-5 to ensure that test correctly work with CI options.
>> 
>> The serviceability/jdwp/AllModulesCommandTest.java is the only one test in 
>> serviceability/jdwp directory so no other tests should be affected.
>> 
>> I closed my previous PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/15499 because 
>> GitHub incorrectly show changes after merge with backout if the first fix.
>
> Leonid Mesnik has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Update test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jdwp/DebuggeeLauncher.java
>   
>   Co-authored-by: Chris Plummer <chris.plum...@oracle.com>

test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jdwp/DebuggeeLauncher.java line 66:

> 64:     /**
> 65:      * Starts the debuggee with the necessary JDWP options and handles the
> 66:      * debuggee's stdout output. stderr migth contain jvm output and just 
> printed to the log

Suggestion:

     * debuggee's stdout output. stderr might contain jvm output, which is just 
printed to the log.

test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jdwp/DebuggeeLauncher.java line 100:

> 98: 
> 99:     @Override
> 100:     public void onStringRead(String line) {

Is there a reason not to also echo the stdout output? Seems it would be useful 
if the test ever failed. Doing so probably means adding back in the 
StreamHandler argument.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15544#discussion_r1313553274
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15544#discussion_r1313560196

Reply via email to