On Tue, 16 May 2023 23:42:46 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo 
<pchilanom...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I'd suggest to name new test as `ThreadStateTest`, `JvmtiThreadStateTest` or 
>> `ThreadStateSanityTest`.
>> One more quick suggestion is to replace JVMTI state in the comments to 
>> `JvmtiThreadState`.
>
>> I'd suggest to name new test as `ThreadStateTest`, `JvmtiThreadStateTest` or 
>> `ThreadStateSanityTest`. One more quick suggestion is to replace JVMTI state 
>> in the comments to `JvmtiThreadState`.
>>
> Good suggestions, done.

@pchilano Thank you for explanations and adding the test.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13949#issuecomment-1551613747

Reply via email to