On Sat, 2 Jul 2022 21:19:55 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This fixes a bug in the debug agent when there is a request to suspend a 
>> virtual thread that has already terminated. The issue was that unless the 
>> debug agent was currently under a "suspend all", it would not properly put 
>> the virtual thread on the `otherThreads` list, and instead added it to 
>> `runningVThreads`. This meant at the end of `insertThread()` the following 
>> code tried to do a JVMTI `SetThreadLocalStorage`, which can't be done on a 
>> terminated thread.
>> 
>> 
>>         if (list != &otherThreads) {
>>             setThreadLocalStorage(node->thread, (void*)node);
>>         }
>
> Chris Plummer has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 11 additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk19 into 8287847_nb
>    merge
>  - Rename thread to targetThread. Verify targetThread state when the thread 
> dies and when the breakpoint after the join() is reached.
>  - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk19 into 8287847_nb
>    merge
>  - provide a slightly more descriptive @summary
>  - Add new SuspendAfterDeath test to jdk_jdi_sanity test group.
>  - Always run test both in virtual and platform thread modes
>  - No need to initialzie boolean to false.
>  - Get rid of need to cast toArray() result to a String[]
>  - fix indentation
>  - fixed jcheck errors
>  - ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19/compare/42a7f5bb...1d087b2f

In fact, webrev v9 does not have any changes.
Is it a merge with JDK 19?

-------------

Marked as reviewed by sspitsyn (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19/pull/88

Reply via email to