On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 at 14:12, Serge Droz via Security-wg <
[email protected]> wrote:

> In the day and age of cloud services there are hundreds of examples of
> services provided to different jurisdictions. Usually the law of your legal
> residence applies.
>

That is not true. If your cloud service has it's data centres in the USA
then US law applies to your data, regardless of your residence.

cheers
denis


>
>
> Furthermore, APnic and Lacnic do such things, and they cover multiple
> jurisdictions,a fact you seem to ignore. At least let us know what makes
> them different from us,in away that cannot be changed.
>
> And your cutlery vendor analogy doesn't cut it: Once the knife is sold,
> the vendor doesn't control it anymore. That is different from ip addresses.
>
> Best
> Serge
>
>
> On 2 August 2026 10:26:01 UTC, Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote on 01/08/2026 16:31:
>>
>>> That suggests that some capacity building is in order.  They have what is 
>>> effectively a fiduciary duty to IP space.
>>>
>>> So they can no more not develop competence in this than a bank manager can 
>>> disclaim all competence in assessing whether a loan that they disburse is 
>>> going to be repaid or not, used for illegal activity or not etc.
>>>
>>
>> Suresh,
>>
>> the RIPE NCC has a fiduciary duty to registration of IP space. How those 
>> number resources are used is an issue for the courts and the law.
>>
>> Your comparison with the bank manager is inapplicable for a lot of reasons, 
>> the main ones being that a bank is not a registration authority and - unlike 
>> money - an IP address isn't at risk of disappearing into thin air when the 
>> holder walks out the front door.
>>
>> If you want to claim that the bank manager is still on the hook to do some 
>> due diligence to ensure that it's not obviously being used for illegal 
>> activity, there's no problem pulling out another somewhat inapplicable 
>> comparison and say that road / motorway operators don't seem to be bound by 
>> any sort of due diligence for use of their resources, and knowingly allow 
>> their roads to be used for all sorts of crimes, many heinous. There are 
>> plenty of situations in society where abuse of a resource or a registration 
>> can cause harm and where we don't require any sort of due diligence: cutlery 
>> vendors don't check their customer out if someone walks in to buy a carving 
>> knife; the IEEE isn't on the hook if their MAC addresses are used in NICs 
>> which are used for network abuse, and so forth.
>>
>> The point is not that that you can't invoke comparisons of dubious 
>> comparative value with other organisations or societal structures, it's that 
>> the RIPE NCC is in something of a unique position, being a registration 
>> organisation for a large number of countries for numbers which are used for 
>> international communications. We don't have a direct analogue anywhere else.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> --
> Dr. Serge Droz
> Director, Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams
> https://first.org
> -----
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options,
> please visit:
> https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/security-wg.ripe.net/
> As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with
> the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings.
> More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
-----
To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, 
please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/security-wg.ripe.net/
As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the 
email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. 
More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/

Reply via email to