On Mon, 1 Jun 2026 14:46:03 GMT, Andrey Turbanov <[email protected]> wrote:

>> David Simms has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 2754 commits:
>> 
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'valhalla/lworld' into 
>> jep401_sub_review_8317279
>>  - Merge
>>    
>>    Merge jdk-27+24
>>  - 8385674: [lworld] TestNullableInlineTypes.java fails after JDK-8325632
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: mchevalier
>>  - 8385652: [lworld] RedefineClasses should use stack map frame name
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: fparain
>>  - 8384107: [lworld] Update runtime/contended tests to run the same testing 
>> for value classes
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: fparain, lmesnik
>>  - 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: vromero
>>  - 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early 
>> construction context
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: liach, vromero
>>  - 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin 
>> jtreg option
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: lmesnik
>>  - 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: fparain, vlivanov
>>  - 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature
>>    8382708: [lworld] JVMCI support for Value Objects
>>    8372605: [lworld] 
>> compiler/jvmci/jdk.vm.ci.runtime.test/src/jdk/vm/ci/runtime/test/TestResolvedJava*.java
>>  fail with --enable-preview
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: thartmann
>>  - ... and 2744 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/2c7efc08...9e804255
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/InvalidClassException.java line 31:
> 
>> 29:  * Thrown when the Serialization runtime detects one of the following
>> 30:  * problems with a Class.
>> 31:  * <ul>
> 
> I think it make sense to move this cleanup to separate PR. Or just revert 
> changes to reduce size of diff

This is done as part of the spec updates for serialization. We will change this 
bullet list anyways to address value classes, this is ok.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31123#discussion_r3343175210

Reply via email to