On Mon, 1 Jun 2026 09:11:30 GMT, David Simms <[email protected]> wrote:

>> This is a "*sub-review pull request*" for the first 
>> [preview](https://openjdk.org/jeps/12) of [JEP 401: Value Classes and 
>> Objects](https://openjdk.org/jeps/401), specifically 
>> [JDK-8317279](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317279): Standard library 
>> implementation of value classes and objects 
>> 
>>> [!NOTE]
>>> This pull request and the other sub-review pull requests listed below are 
>>> based on the "*master pull request*" 
>>> (https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31120). It contains the same full set 
>>> of code changes as the "*master pull request*" to preserve the full 
>>> implementation context; the language compiler, JVM, and standard library 
>>> changes are intertwined. This separate pull requests exist only to 
>>> subdivide the review and related discussion by area.
>> 
>> Other areas for review:
>> 
>> - [JDK-8317277](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317277): Java language 
>> implementation of value classes and objects
>>   - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31121
>> - [JDK-8317278](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317278): JVM 
>> implementation of value classes and objects
>>   - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31122
>> 
>> Code changes resulting from the review process should be made in 
>> [`valhalla/lworld`](https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/).
>> 
>> `valhalla/lworld` is currently updated from `jdk/master` whenever a weekly 
>> [`jdk` tag](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/tags) is created. At that time, 
>> code changes from `valhalla/lworld` will be propagated to the master pull 
>> request and to all sub-review pull requests, including this one.
>> 
>> Ultimately, review sign-off will be recorded on the "*master pull request*", 
>> and this pull request will be closed without integration.
>> 
>> This pull request has a large code surface area and often conflicts with 
>> `jdk/master` on a daily basis. Refer to 
>> [`valhalla/lworld`](https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/) for the latest 
>> state of the project code, keeping in mind that it may lag several days 
>> behind `jdk/master`. Both repositories may be needed as references during 
>> review.
>> 
>> ---------
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> David Simms has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 2754 commits:
> 
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'valhalla/lworld' into 
> jep401_sub_review_8317279
>  - Merge
>    
>    Merge jdk-27+24
>  - 8385674: [lworld] TestNullableInlineTypes.java fails after JDK-8325632
>    
>    Reviewed-by: mchevalier
>  - 8385652: [lworld] RedefineClasses should use stack map frame name
>    
>    Reviewed-by: fparain
>  - 8384107: [lworld] Update runtime/contended tests to run the same testing 
> for value classes
>    
>    Reviewed-by: fparain, lmesnik
>  - 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields
>    
>    Reviewed-by: vromero
>  - 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early 
> construction context
>    
>    Reviewed-by: liach, vromero
>  - 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin 
> jtreg option
>    
>    Reviewed-by: lmesnik
>  - 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines
>    
>    Reviewed-by: fparain, vlivanov
>  - 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature
>    8382708: [lworld] JVMCI support for Value Objects
>    8372605: [lworld] 
> compiler/jvmci/jdk.vm.ci.runtime.test/src/jdk/vm/ci/runtime/test/TestResolvedJava*.java
>  fail with --enable-preview
>    
>    Reviewed-by: thartmann
>  - ... and 2744 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/2c7efc08...9e804255

src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/InvalidClassException.java line 31:

> 29:  * Thrown when the Serialization runtime detects one of the following
> 30:  * problems with a Class.
> 31:  * <ul>

I think it make sense to move this cleanup to separate PR. Or just revert 
changes to reduce size of diff

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31123#discussion_r3335011300

Reply via email to