On Mon, 2 Mar 2026 03:45:07 GMT, xinyangwu <[email protected]> wrote: > You are right. My original performance evaluation was done using > PKCS5Padding, which is why it was specifically called out in the synopsis. > However, these changes apply to AES/ECB encryption and decryption regardless > of the padding mode.
BTW, the benchmarks for no padding showed a 132%+ increase in performance for 16KB data tests. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29385#issuecomment-3986596552
