On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 08:07:04 GMT, Shawn Emery <[email protected]> wrote:
> One last note/question: why is PKCS5 padding called out in the synopsis > specifically, given that these changes also affect the no padding version? You are right. My original performance evaluation was done using PKCS5Padding, which is why it was specifically called out in the synopsis. However, these changes apply to AES/ECB encryption and decryption regardless of the padding mode. I’ve updated the description to reflect that this optimization affects AES/ECB in general, not only the PKCS5Padding case. Thanks for pointing this out! ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29385#issuecomment-3981843721
