On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:18:22 GMT, Weijun Wang <wei...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Implement HPKE as defined in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9180/.
>> ![HPKEParameterSpec](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4a7e6609-fd64-444a-978f-bde1634caa70)
>
> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   switch to Asserts.assertThrows in test; use traditional javadoc style

Some initial comments.

src/java.base/share/classes/javax/crypto/spec/HPKEParameterSpec.java line 55:

> 53:  * provided to {@code init()}.
> 54:  * <li> {@link #of(int, int)} creates an instance with explicitly 
> specified
> 55:  * KDF, and AEAD algorithm identifiers, but the KEM algorithm identifier 
> will be

No comma necessary after "KDF".

src/java.base/share/classes/javax/crypto/spec/HPKEParameterSpec.java line 55:

> 53:  * provided to {@code init()}.
> 54:  * <li> {@link #of(int, int)} creates an instance with explicitly 
> specified
> 55:  * KDF, and AEAD algorithm identifiers, but the KEM algorithm identifier 
> will be

I'd suggest breaking this into two sentences, remove the ", but" from the first 
sentence, and start the second sentence as "The KEM algorithm identifier ..."

src/java.base/share/classes/javax/crypto/spec/HPKEParameterSpec.java line 65:

> 63:  * defined in <a 
> href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9180.html#section-7";>Section 7</a>
> 64:  * of RFC 9180 and the
> 65:  * <a href="https://www.iana.org/assignments/hpke/hpke.xhtml";>IANA HPKE 
> page</a>.

I think it would be useful to mention here that there are constants defined for 
the standard algorithms. My initial reading of this, I thought I would have to 
lookup the hex values and convert them to integers to use the API.

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18411#pullrequestreview-2679715999
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18411#discussion_r1992201674
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18411#discussion_r1992206217
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18411#discussion_r1993585316

Reply via email to