On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:44:00 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <djelin...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I tried this and it caused a lockup in one of the tests. I see why your >> think this is the right change, but it isn't proving out in the testing > > That's very interesting! Which test was it? Was it with or without #19465? I do run the tests layered on the current #19465, even though this PR is separate. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19862#discussion_r1653610125
