On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 20:52:56 GMT, Pavel Rappo <pra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Are you sure? I just checked lines 91-92 and I'd say the change looks >> correct. > >> The original `<=` was correct, the number of bits in the input array must be >> less than the requested length of the BitArray. The constructors also >> describe the length using `<=`; they all should be consistent. > > Hm... My reading is that those "i.e." parts state preconditions for the > constructors to return successfully, not preconditions for them to throw an > exception. I stand corrected. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14738#discussion_r1253655028
