On 28 Jun 2009, at 11:22, Daniel J. Priem wrote:
Snapshots are significantly faster as well. My average transfer speed
went from about 15MB/sec to over 40MB/sec. I imagine that 40MB/sec is
now a limitation of the CPU, as I can see SSH maxing out a single
core
on the quad cores.
Maybe SSH
On 21 Apr 2007, at 04:42, Rich Brown wrote:
Hi,
so far, discussing filesystem code via opensolaris
means a certain
"specialization", in the sense that we do have:
zfs-discuss
ufs-discuss
fuse-discuss
Likewise, there are ZFS, NFS and UFS communities
(though I can't quite
figure out if we hav
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 07:25 -0500, Rich Brown wrote:
> As it turns out, that has been proposed along with some other
> reorganization of communities/projects:
>
>http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-April/000289.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rich
>
Ah, ok. Nice to see this i
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 02:16 -0800, Thomas Lecomte wrote:
> Hello there -
>
> I'm still waiting for an answer from Phillip Lougher [the SquashFS developer].
> I had already contacted him some month ago, without any answer though.
>
> I'll still write a proposal, and probably start the work soon t
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:27 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Mark Phalan wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 02:16 -0800, Thomas Lecomte wrote:
> >> Hello there -
> >>
> >> I'm still waiting for an answer from Phillip
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 17:20 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> hex.cookie wrote:
> > In production environment, which platform should we use? Solaris 10 U4 or
> > OpenSolaris 70+? How should we estimate a stable edition for production?
> > Or OpenSolaris is stable in some build?
>
> All depends o
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 07:22 -0800, Nabeel Saad wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about using ZFS with Fuse. A little bit of background of
> what we've been doing first... We recently had an issue with a Solaris
> server where the permissions of the main system files in /etc and such were
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 11:42 +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> I regularly create new zfs filesystems or snapshots and I find it
> annoying that I have to type the full dataset name in all of those cases.
>
> I propose we allow zfs(1) to infer the part of the dataset name upto the
> current working
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 07:12 -0400, Mark J Musante wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Mark Phalan wrote:
>
> > I find this annoying as well. Another way that would help (but is fairly
> > orthogonal to your suggestion) would be to write a completion module for
> > zsh/
Hi,
I'm using b48 on two machines.. when I issued the following I get a
panic on the recv'ing machine:
$ zfs send -i data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh machine2
zfs recv -F data
doing the following caused no problems:
zfs send -i data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
code for -F. I'm looking into it...
Great, thanks!
>
> thanks for testing!
Heh.. I'm not testing - I'm USING :)
-Mark
> Noel
>
> On Sep 26, 2006, at 6:21 AM, Mark Phalan wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using b48 on two machines.. w
11 matches
Mail list logo
