Kent Watsen wrote:
> Eric Schrock wrote:
>> For x86 systems, you can use ipmitool to manipulate the led state
>> (ipmitool sunoem led ...). On older galaxy systems, you can only set the
>> fail LED ('io.hdd0.led'), as the ok2rm LED is not physically connected
>> to anything. On newer systems, yo
Paul Jochum wrote:
>What the lsiutil does for me is clear the persistent mapping for
> all of the drives on a card.
Since James confirms that I'm doomed to ad hoc methods tracking
device-ids to bays, I'm interested in knowing if somehow your ability to
clear the persistent mapping for
Hi,
On Dec 14, 2007 7:50 PM, Louwtjie Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I would have said ... to be expected, since the 280 came with a
> 100Mbit interface. So a 9-12 MB/s peak would be acceptable. You did
> mention a "gigabit switch"... did you install a gigabit HBA ? If
> that's the case
Hi,
sorry for the lengthy post ...
On Dec 15, 2007 1:56 PM, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Sequential writing problem with process throttling - there's an open
> bug for it for quite a while. Try to lower txg_time to 1s - should
> help a little bit.
Since setting txg_time to
Hi,
On Dec 14, 2007 8:24 PM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Penczek wrote:
> >
> > The performance is slightly disappointing. Does anyone have
> > a similar setup and can anyone share some figures?
> > Any pointers to possible improvements are greatly appreciated.
> >
> >
>
> Us
Hi Kent:
So, in using the lsiutil utility, what do I find, but the following
option: (this was under the hidden option 15)
12. Change (enable/disable) persistence
I have not had a chance to try it, but it says the default is
Enabled. Let me know if you try it.
Paul
Kent Watsen wrot
> r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device
> 0.0 48.00.0 3424.6 0.0 35.00.0 728.9 0 100 c2t8d0
> 0.0 60.00.0 4280.8 0.0 35.00.0 583.1 0 100 c2t9d0
> 0.0 55.00.0 3938.2 0.0 35.00.0 636.1 0 100 c2t10d0
> 0.0 56.0
hi Frank,
there is an interesting pattern here (at least, to my
untrained eyes) - your %b starts off quite low:
Frank Penczek wrote:
> ---
> dd'ing to NFS mount:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]://tmp> dd if=./file.tmp of=/home/fpz/file.tmp
> 20+0 records in
> 20+0 records out
> 10240 bytes
On Dec 16, 2007 1:16 AM, Sasidhar Kasturi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes .. but have a look at the bug i am working on ..
> Bug id:6493125
>
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6493125
>
> Thank you,
> Sasidhar.
I'm not sure what question you are asking...
1) Why are there two var
