Hi,
On Dec 14, 2007 7:50 PM, Louwtjie Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I would have said ... to be expected, since the 280 came with a
> 100Mbit interface. So a 9-12 MB/s peak would be acceptable. You did
> mention a "gigabit switch"... did you install a gigabit HBA ? If
> that's the case then yes, performance sucks.
Yes, sorry, I forgot to mention that we're using a GigaSwift NIC in that
machine.
> fsstat?
What 'fsstat' output are you interested in? For a start here's 'fsstat -F':
# fsstat -F
new name name attr attr lookup rddir read read write write
file remov chng get set ops ops ops bytes ops bytes
660K 69.8K 16.0K 11.3M 170K 60.2M 154K 25.6M 14.0G 6.05M 58.9G ufs
0 0 0 43.6K 0 78.8K 14.0K 27.8K 10.0M 0 0 proc
0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nfs
30.7K 7.67K 11.2K 348M 56.9K 122M 4.61M 1.65M 25.1G 1.05M 58.2G zfs
0 0 0 574K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lofs
162K 17.3K 120K 273K 15.9K 1.48M 4.60K 418K 1.24G 1.10M 5.93G tmpfs
0 0 0 6.18K 0 0 0 51 9.31K 0 0 mntfs
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nfs3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nfs4
0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 autofs
Thanks,
Frank
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
