Hi,

On Dec 14, 2007 8:24 PM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Penczek wrote:
> >
> > The performance is slightly disappointing. Does anyone have
> > a similar setup and can anyone share some figures?
> > Any pointers to possible improvements are greatly appreciated.
> >
> >
>
> Use a faster processor or change to a mirrored configuration.
> raidz2 can become processor bound in the Reed-Soloman calculations
> for the 2nd parity set.  You should be able to see this in mpstat, and to
> a coarser grain in vmstat.
>  -- richard

Thanks for the hint. When dd'ing to the pool, mpstat tells me:

# mpstat 1
CPU minf mjf xcal  intr ithr  csw icsw migr smtx  srw syscl  usr sys  wt idl
  0   46   0   67   518  413  509    4   46   26    0   272    1   3   0  96
  1   44   0   64  1765  141  576    5   46   26    0   256    1   3   0  96
CPU minf mjf xcal  intr ithr  csw icsw migr smtx  srw syscl  usr sys  wt idl
  0    0   0   10   804  698 1130    4   69   52    0   218    0   5   0  95
  1    7   0   10  3301  390 1189    5   79   64    0   106    0   4   0  96
CPU minf mjf xcal  intr ithr  csw icsw migr smtx  srw syscl  usr sys  wt idl
  0    0   0    4   294  188  601    3   56   59    0    85    0   2   0  98
  1    0   0    4  1029  319  593    1   57   61    0    78    0   2   0  98
CPU minf mjf xcal  intr ithr  csw icsw migr smtx  srw syscl  usr sys  wt idl
  0    0   0    2   303  198  238    2   33   10    0   145    0   0   0 100
  1    0   0    4   283   74  261    3   30    8    0   159    0   1   0  99
CPU minf mjf xcal  intr ithr  csw icsw migr smtx  srw syscl  usr sys  wt idl
  0    2   0  113  1055  885  813  137  120   20    9 32833    7  57   0  36
  1   90   2   74  3622  220 1328   74  118   49   18 19956    5  45   0  50
CPU minf mjf xcal  intr ithr  csw icsw migr smtx  srw syscl  usr sys  wt idl
  0   14   0  115   438  191  876  181  127   40    0 32425    7  54   0  39
  1   14   0  197  1513  453  671  118  132   54    0 23929    5  53   0  42
CPU minf mjf xcal  intr ithr  csw icsw migr smtx  srw syscl  usr sys  wt idl
  0    0   0   98   901  679 1726  163  189   43    0 26718    5  48   0  47
  1    0   0  121  3722  508  843  171  194   32    0 29947    6  53   0  41
CPU minf mjf xcal  intr ithr  csw icsw migr smtx  srw syscl  usr sys  wt idl
  0    0   0   50   418  185  905  162  109   21    0 31884    7  54   0  39
  1    0   0  135  1772  550  670  102  107   37    0 23882    5  55   0  40
CPU minf mjf xcal  intr ithr  csw icsw migr smtx  srw syscl  usr sys  wt idl
  0    0   0   58   353  184  330  106  105   17    0 30134   28  47   0  26
  1    1   0   74   862  250  604  128  106   27    0 26312    6  45   0  50
CPU minf mjf xcal  intr ithr  csw icsw migr smtx  srw syscl  usr sys  wt idl
  0    0   0   60  1087  851 1542  231  174   31    1 33800    7  61   0  32
  1    0   0  136  4191  444 1072  125  165   39    1 20273    4  52   0  44
...

Based on the 'idl' column I interpret these numbers as
"there are resources left" or is it me being naive?

Cheers,
  Frank
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to