Christine Tran writes:
>> OOps, I may have looked at the wrong bart.
>
> I think he meant this BART:
> http://blogs.sun.com/gbrunett/entry/automating_solaris_10_file_integrity
>
> I'm going to make one quick comment about this, despite better
> judgment to probably keep quiet. I don't think anyo
> OOps, I may have looked at the wrong bart.
I think he meant this BART:
http://blogs.sun.com/gbrunett/entry/automating_solaris_10_file_integrity
I'm going to make one quick comment about this, despite better
judgment to probably keep quiet. I don't think anyone should use ZFS
as a VCS like Subv
Harry Putnam writes:
> At just a quick read, it really just sounds like rsync, after its been in a
> severe wreck and was badly crippled.
OOps, I may have looked at the wrong bart. One of the first hits
google turned up was:
http://www.zhornsoftware.co.uk/bart/index.html
But I think maybe
Brandon High writes:
> Someone pointed out that you can use bart, but that also scans the
> directories. It might do what you want, but it doesn't work at the zpool /
> zfs level, just at the file level layer.
Apparently I missed any suggestion about bart, but looking it up just
now, I guess may
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Matt Cowger writes:
>
>> zfs list | grep '@'
>>
>> zpool/f...@1154758 324G - 461G -
>> zpool/f...@1208482 6.94G - 338G -
>> zpool/f...@daily.netbackup 1.0
s.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] snapshots as versioning tool
+--
| On 2010-03-23 16:09:05, Harry Putnam wrote:
|
| Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:09:05 -0500
| From: Harry Putnam
| To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
| Subject: Re:
+--
| On 2010-03-23 16:09:05, Harry Putnam wrote:
|
| Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:09:05 -0500
| From: Harry Putnam
| To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
| Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] snapshots as versioning tool
|
| Matt
Matt Cowger writes:
> zfs list | grep '@'
>
> zpool/f...@1154758324G - 461G -
> zpool/f...@1208482 6.94G - 338G -
> zpool/f...@daily.netbackup 1.07G - 344G -
> zpool/f...@1154758
> > You can easily determine if the snapshot has changed by checking the
> > output of zfs list for the snapshot.
>
> Do you mean to just grep it out of the output of
>
> zfs list -t snapshot
I think the point is: You can easily tell how many MB changed in a
snapshot, and therefore you can ea
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 03/23/10 09:34 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Oh, something I meant to ask... is there some standard way to tell
>> before calling for a snapshot, if the directory structure has changed
>> at all, other than aging I mean. Is there something
scuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Harry Putnam
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 2:23 PM
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] snapshots as versioning tool
Matt Cowger writes:
> This is totally doable, and a reasonable use of zfs snapshots - we
> do some simil
Matt Cowger writes:
> This is totally doable, and a reasonable use of zfs snapshots - we
> do some similar things.
Good, thanks for the input.
> You can easily determine if the snapshot has changed by checking the
> output of zfs list for the snapshot.
Do you mean to just grep it out of the ou
> This may be a bit dimwitted since I don't really understand how
> snapshots work. I mean the part concerning COW (copy on right) and
> how it takes so little room.
COW and snapshots are very simple to explain. Suppose you're chugging along
using your filesystem, and then one moment, you tell t
On 03/23/10 09:34 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
This may be a bit dimwitted since I don't really understand how
snapshots work. I mean the part concerning COW (copy on right) and
how it takes so little room.
But here I'm not asking about that.
It appears to me that the default snapshot setup shares
This is totally doable, and a reasonable use of zfs snapshots - we do some
similar things.
You can easily determine if the snapshot has changed by checking the output of
zfs list for the snapshot.
--M
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-bou
15 matches
Mail list logo
