Brandon High <bh...@freaks.com> writes: > Someone pointed out that you can use bart, but that also scans the > directories. It might do what you want, but it doesn't work at the zpool / > zfs level, just at the file level layer.
Apparently I missed any suggestion about bart, but looking it up just now, I guess maybe in what they call `safe mode' where changed files aren't deleted, it might be useful as a versioning tool. Sounds like it could be targeted with a little finer granularity than snapshots generally can be. At just a quick read, it really just sounds like rsync, after its been in a severe wreck and was badly crippled. Maybe `bart' handles windows files better than rsync? I'm just curious why `bart' would be recommended over rsync? Are there abilities that make it more attractive? _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
