Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs hardware failure questions

2008-11-20 Thread Miles Nordin
> "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: t> PSARC 2007/567 zpool failmode property I think this is in s10u6, so it's been in stable solaris for twenty-one days. It's not in the release I tested, so it's worth trying again on a newer release. I tried on snv_83a, and instead of getting

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs hardware failure questions

2008-11-20 Thread Miles Nordin
> "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: t> I gave you a the PSARC. test it. t> Which is why I told him not to do it, and that his chances t> were slim... his chances are zero. pgp8S8MQKP3kP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ zfs

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs hardware failure questions

2008-11-20 Thread Tim
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Miles Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > t> Uhh, yes. There's more than one post here describing how to > t> set what the system does when the pool is in a faulted > t> state/you lose a drive. Wait,

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs hardware failure questions

2008-11-20 Thread Miles Nordin
> "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: t> Uhh, yes. There's more than one post here describing how to t> set what the system does when the pool is in a faulted t> state/you lose a drive. Wait, panic, proceed. (a) search for it, try it, then report your results. Don't coun

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs hardware failure questions

2008-11-20 Thread Tim
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Miles Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > t> Pretty sure ALL of the above are settings that can be changed. > > nope. But feel free to be more specific. Or repeat the test > yourself---it only takes like fifte

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs hardware failure questions

2008-11-20 Thread Tim
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Miles Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > t> Pretty sure ALL of the above are settings that can be changed. > > nope. But feel free to be more specific. Or repeat the test > yourself---it only takes like fifte

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs hardware failure questions

2008-11-20 Thread Miles Nordin
> "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: t> Pretty sure ALL of the above are settings that can be changed. nope. But feel free to be more specific. Or repeat the test yourself---it only takes like fifteen minutes. It'd take five if not for the rebooting. t> Not to mention that

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs hardware failure questions

2008-11-20 Thread Tim
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Miles Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> a fourth 500gb disk and add > >> it to the pool as the second vdev, what happens when that > >> fourth disk has a hardware failure? > > t> If you set cop

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs hardware failure questions

2008-11-20 Thread Miles Nordin
> "t" == Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> a fourth 500gb disk and add >> it to the pool as the second vdev, what happens when that >> fourth disk has a hardware failure? t> If you set copies=2, and get lucky enough t> that copies of every block on the standalone ar

[zfs-discuss] zfs hardware failure questions

2008-11-20 Thread Kam
I was asked a few interesting questions by a fellow co-worker regarding ZFS and after much google-bombing, still can't find answers. I've seen several people try to ask these questions, but only to have been answered indirectly. If I have a pool that consists of a raidz-1 w/ three 500gb disks an

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs hardware failure questions

2008-11-20 Thread Tim
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Kam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was asked a few interesting questions by a fellow co-worker regarding ZFS > and after much google-bombing, still can't find answers. I've seen several > people try to ask these questions, but only to have been answered > indirectl