>>>>> "t" == Tim  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

     t> Uhh, yes.  There's more than one post here describing how to
     t> set what the system does when the pool is in a faulted
     t> state/you lose a drive.  Wait, panic, proceed.

(a) search for it, try it, then report your results.  Don't counter a
    reasonably-designed albeit quick test with stardust and fantasy
    based on vague innuendos.

(b) ``ALL of the above are settings that can be changed.''  Please
    tell me how to fix ``ALL'' my problems, which you claim are all
    fixable without enumerating them.  I will:

    1. panic on exporting pool
 
    2. 'zpool import foolpool' coredumps

    3. pools backed by unavailable iSCSI targets and stored in
       zpool.cache prevent bootup

    4. WARNING: ZFS replay transaction error 30, dataset boot/usr, seq 0x134c, 
txtype 9

    5. disappearing, reappearing /usr/export/t00 (the backing for the
       file vdev was another ZFS pool, so this is also a ZFS problem)

Yeah, I'm pressing the issue.  But I'm annoyed because I gave the
question an honest go and got a clear result, and instead of repeating
my test as you easily could, you dismiss the result without even
reading it carefully.  I think it's possible to give much better
advice by trying the the thing out than by extrapolating marketing
claims.

     t> I've read of more than one person here that has worked with a
     t> Sun Engineer to manually re-create the metadata.

(a) not in this situation, they didn't.  The loss was much less
    catastrophic than a whole vdev---in fact it wasn't ever proven
    that anything was lost at all by the underlying storage.  I think
    the pool may also have been simpler structure, like a
    single-device vdev exported as a LUN from a SAN.

(b) that's not the same thing as *backline*, whatever that is.

(c) that's pretty far short of ``if you get lucky enough ... you might
    be able to survive.''  My claim: there is zero chance of importing
    the pool in the normal, supported way after this failure scenario.

(d) I don't think the OP had in mind counting on support from Sun
    engineering when you responded by suggesting an unredundant pool
    with copies=2 might suit his needs.

Attachment: pgpay2xwP8YSt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to