On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Robert Thurlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon High wrote:
>> AFAIK, you're doing the best that you can while playing in the
>> constraints of ZFS. If you want to use nfs v3 with your clients,
>> you'll need to use UFS as the back end.
>
> Just a clarification:
Brandon High wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Andy Lubel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tried this today and although things appear to function correctly, the
>> performance seems to be steadily degrading. Am I getting burnt by
>> double-caching? If so, what is the best way to workaround f
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Andy Lubel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tried this today and although things appear to function correctly, the
> performance seems to be steadily degrading. Am I getting burnt by
> double-caching? If so, what is the best way to workaround for my sad
> situation? I
On Jun 9, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Andy Lubel wrote:
>
> On Jun 6, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Andy Lubel wrote:
>
>> That was it!
>>
>> hpux-is-old.com -> nearline.host NFS C GETATTR3 FH=F6B3
>> nearline.host -> hpux-is-old.com NFS R GETATTR3 OK
>> hpux-is-old.com -> nearline.host NFS C SETATTR3 FH=F6B3
>> nea
On Jun 6, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Andy Lubel wrote:
> That was it!
>
> hpux-is-old.com -> nearline.host NFS C GETATTR3 FH=F6B3
> nearline.host -> hpux-is-old.com NFS R GETATTR3 OK
> hpux-is-old.com -> nearline.host NFS C SETATTR3 FH=F6B3
> nearline.host -> hpux-is-old.com NFS R SETATTR3 Update synch m
That was it!
hpux-is-old.com -> nearline.host NFS C GETATTR3 FH=F6B3
nearline.host -> hpux-is-old.com NFS R GETATTR3 OK
hpux-is-old.com -> nearline.host NFS C SETATTR3 FH=F6B3
nearline.host -> hpux-is-old.com NFS R SETATTR3 Update synch mismatch
hpux-is-old.com -> nearline.host NFS C GETATTR3 FH=F
Andy Lubel wrote:
> I've got a real doozie.. We recently implemented a b89 as zfs/nfs/
> cifs server. The NFS client is HP-UX (11.23).
>
> What's happening is when our dba edits a file on the nfs mount with
> vi, it will not save.
>
> I removed vi from the mix by doing 'touch /nfs/file1' t
Andy Lubel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a real doozie.. We recently implemented a b89 as zfs/nfs/
> cifs server. The NFS client is HP-UX (11.23).
>
> What's happening is when our dba edits a file on the nfs mount with
> vi, it will not save.
>
> I removed vi from the mix by doing 'touch /nfs
Hello,
I've got a real doozie.. We recently implemented a b89 as zfs/nfs/
cifs server. The NFS client is HP-UX (11.23).
What's happening is when our dba edits a file on the nfs mount with
vi, it will not save.
I removed vi from the mix by doing 'touch /nfs/file1' then 'echo abc
> /nfs/f
