Brandon High wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Andy Lubel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Tried this today and although things appear to function correctly, the >> performance seems to be steadily degrading. Am I getting burnt by >> double-caching? If so, what is the best way to workaround for my sad >> situation? I tried directio for the ufs volume and it made it even >> worse.. > > AFAIK, you're doing the best that you can while playing in the > constraints of ZFS. If you want to use nfs v3 with your clients, > you'll need to use UFS as the back end.
Just a clarification: NFSv3 isn't a problem to my knowledge in general; Andy has a problem with a HP-UX client bug that he can't appear to get a fix for. Rob T _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
