On Thu, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Spencer Shepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> > >
> > > On Oct 25, 2006, at 15:38, Roger Ripley wrote:
> > >
> > > >IBM has contributed code for NFSv4 ACLs under AIX's JFS; hopefully
> > > >Sun will not tarry in following th
Spencer Shepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 25, 2006, at 15:38, Roger Ripley wrote:
> >
> > >IBM has contributed code for NFSv4 ACLs under AIX's JFS; hopefully
> > >Sun will not tarry in following their lead for ZFS.
> > >
> > >http://lists.samba
On Wed, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 2006, at 15:38, Roger Ripley wrote:
>
> >IBM has contributed code for NFSv4 ACLs under AIX's JFS; hopefully
> >Sun will not tarry in following their lead for ZFS.
> >
> >http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs/2006-September/070855.html
>
> I tho
On Oct 25, 2006, at 15:38, Roger Ripley wrote:
IBM has contributed code for NFSv4 ACLs under AIX's JFS; hopefully
Sun will not tarry in following their lead for ZFS.
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs/2006-September/070855.html
I thought this was still in draft:
http://ietf.org/inter
IBM has contributed code for NFSv4 ACLs under AIX's JFS; hopefully Sun will not
tarry in following their lead for ZFS.
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs/2006-September/070855.html
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss maili
ZFS/NFSv4 introduced a new acl model (see acl(2) ...nevada (OpenSolaris)
Solaris10u2). There is no compatibility bridge between the
GETACL/SETACL/GETACLCNT and ACE_SETACL/ACE_SETACL/ACE_GETACLCNT fonctions of
acl(2) syscall. Because this is Solaris speciffic (samba.org defines its
internal acl
