On Thu, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Spencer Shepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jonathan Edwards wrote: > > > > > > On Oct 25, 2006, at 15:38, Roger Ripley wrote: > > > > > > >IBM has contributed code for NFSv4 ACLs under AIX's JFS; hopefully > > > >Sun will not tarry in following their lead for ZFS. > > > > > > > >http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs/2006-September/070855.html > > > > > > I thought this was still in draft: > > > http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-acl-mapping-05.txt > > > > That I-D describes the Posix/NFSv4 mapping that can be done. > > > > NFSv4 ACLs to/from Samba/NT ACLs are a different story; no interdependency. > > VFSv4 ACLs are bitwise identical to WIN-NT ACLs, could you please explain > why there is a difference for Samba?
One known difference between NFSv4 ACLs and NT ACLs is information about how ACEs were populated via inheritance. There is a proposal in the NFSv4 WG at the moment to add this functionality to NFSv4.1. Spencer _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
